Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Banlieu Paradox

HLM in Seine-St.Denis where my ASSFAM office is located
In thinking about the recent events, I've been struck by what I call the Banlieu Paradox. In the rough and tough banlieus exist two worlds; those who are ready to fight in contest of their miserable living conditions, others making huge sacrifices, sometimes risking their lives just to get in.

Banlieus are found on the outskirts of a great number of french cities. They usually contain a few nice communities but are mostly composed of cités. Cités are conglomerations of about 5-8 tall, austere concrete block buildings subdivided into as many apartments as will fit. My boss lady took me and the other intern on a car tour yesterday to check out the neighboring cités… we quickly realized our building (seen above) is quite nice compared to the others. We came across street after street of depressing, massive, institution-like complexes. The cités have extremely dense populations crammed in to a small space… huge amounts of human energy with no outlet for diffusion. In the banlieus, there are too few jobs, very few centers for activity… just a sad looking gymnasium here and there.

Take for example, a cité called "les 4,000". Imagine a street the length of a block, with large towers composed of 4,000 apartments, each housing an average of 3-4 people. Now imagine on your suburban street, those of you who get mad at the guy down the street for things like leaving trash out (or vice-versa), having 12,000 neighbors!


These buildings, called HLMs, are provided by the government. France, being a State of “solidarity” – meaning those who have more help those who have very little, construct HLMs in order provide cheap housing for those with small incomes. Unfortunately, they are often built cut-rate, too quickly, with little planning in terms of integrating them in to a viable community. No commerce, few parcs, etc. Poorly designed housing goes back before the 30s when large influxes of immigrant arrived in France. They were encouraged (or forced in the case of many Algeriens) by French officials to come and fill low-wage industrial jobs. These immigrants were always considered temporary employees and therefore the government never bothered to make available adequate lodging. But as years passed, families settled permanently. It is in large part the children and grandchildren of these earlier generations that today are out on the streets vindicating the miserable condition of their communities.

However, the government has put forth great efforts in the last 10 years to rehabilitate these areas. The most dilapidated of towers were demolished, replaced with smaller, more convivial complexes. Extra funds were given to schools in “priority zones” to incite more teachers to come to rough areas and also so schools would be just as equipped as those in richer communities. But, these efforts have done nothing to tackle one of the biggest problems, an extremely high rate of unemployment (40%). It most clearly shows the huge socio-economnic gap between the immigrant dense banlieus and the rest of French socity. And understandably, it leaves a great number of people frustrated and undervalued. That is why Prime Minister Villepin, when he was on the national news the other night, added in his pack of goodies (meant to calm rioters) tax breaks for companies agreeing to build and hire people in these struggling communties. It has been done in the past and with relatively good results.

Now, there is also a huge population of sans papiers, immigrants residing illegally in France. No one really knows how many there are. But, from my experience at work, where we have people knocking at our door every day asking us for help getting them legalized and from the huge sans papiers street protests, I gather there are a large number. They all tell us how horrible it is to have to live in the shadows, always fearing being forced back in to their country. As said before, many arrive because of extreme hardship in their homelands… civil wars, lack of medicine or food, etc. But MANY, come with the false illusion that France is paradise, the land of opportunity. A taxi driver from the Congo explained to me, “you see, they leave with these false ideas, they tell their loved ones they will go and get a good job, make a better life for themselves and their families. Then, they arrive and life is hard, very hard. But, they don’t want to admit it to their families. You see, it is less hard to stay and struggle than to shatter the image, the hope, their loved ones hold back home. Returning to their country would be seen as a defeat."

So for whaterver reason they come to France, often times leaving all their friends and family behind and then struggle for the most basic needs. It is extremely difficult to find shelter. It is not easy to get someone to agree to lodge them. Legal immigrants found housing sans papiers risk expulsion, French citizens risk heavy fines. And though there is a substantial amount of under-the-table jobs such as working in an illegal textile plant, selling vegetables at the market, working construction jobs, they are never stable in pay nor permanent. And since their precarious situation is known, they are easily exploitable. So you see, for the many sans papiers of the banlieus, having their own little space in one of these towers with cheap rent, the right to look for a real employment, the ability to benefit from the enormous financial aid packages the government doles out is the dream. Quick note; for those immigrants that we can help get legalized, they still must face the current 6-7 year waiting list for a spot in an HLM! There is a HUGE housing crisis in France.

You see, it is very difficult to hold a stance when there are so many sides to juggle… the government who has done tremendous work to try to rectify social ills but unable to meet the roots of the problems, the young kids acting out of rage and frustration for their alienation and discrimination and finally the poor individuals who have absolutely no voice and no rights, just struggling to survive.

4 comments:

Ethan said...

This is an outstanding description of the housing problem in France. What struck me is how much it resembles the housing problems in the USA. Housing is often cited as the greatest single problem for poor people in general. Of course, in the USA the poorest people are usually immigrants, especially illegal immigrants.
Madison, WI, and a few other cities have started trying to solve the housing problems you've identified in France by requiring developers to include special low-income housing in ALL new housing developments. So, even luxury buildings would have poor people in them. -Thus, we would try to eliminate places of high desity poverty, and all the troubles that come with that.
Anyway, your post was very helpful in understanding the rioting situation in France.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the comment Ethan. In France too, they try to encourage subsidized housing in all the communities so that everyone shares in helping those most in need. However, the richer cities often pay the penalty fine for not meeting their quota rather than introducing HLM buildings (and therefore immigrants) in their communities. I went to a neighborhood meeting where the mayor spoke and expressed his outrage of this practice. In the city of Aubervillier we are over our quota (45%) whereas a few of the richer neighbors are way under. It is a real problem.

Anonymous said...

Nice paper.
Some slight adjustments: housing were created in the 60s and not the 30s. 30s was economical crisis in France like in the US and immigration was very low.
On the other things, well we could discuss it for a long time. HLM were created as temporary answers to the numerous slums in France at that time due to the massive arrival of immigrants, but the economical recession due to the oil crisis happened just after. They were actually really positive at that time because the living conditions of immigrants.
Concerning the "forced" immigration of Algerian people, I would say it is rather more complicated and the specific situation of the Algerian war makes it more difficult to understand. The Harkis, which came after the war were also in France because they couldn't live in Algerie anymore due to their political engagement with France, either "forced" or not.

Sow Seeds said...

Thanks for your feed back. I wasn't very clear. You are correct, immigration in France is tied to economic factors. France has opened its borders or kicked immigrants out depending on fiscal needs. The housing I was refering to in my entry is that which was made available for the first influxes of immigrant workers filling industrial positions. For example, before WWI in Nantes alone, there was already 30,000 North Africans working in the metalurgical industry and mines. During the war, the first sizeable influx arrived from the Maghreb (172,000). With a great number of soldiers on the battle field, France needed labor to keep large war industries going. In Marocco and Tunisia recrutement was voluntary. In Algeria, where the colonial grip was much stronger, a "réquistion civile" in fact forced a great number of rural peasants to enter in to "le service ouvrier". However, once in France all the migrant workers faced the same terrible conditions. They were considered under the jurisdiction of the "Conseil de Guerre" therefore, their bunker-style housing was heavily guarded and those who refused to work could be sent to a military tribunal. After the war, again many arrived and helped rebuild the country. This continued until 1929 when an economic crisis slowed production and increased unemployment. France therefore forced a lot of migrant workers to leave the country. After WWII France needed to rebuild again so in comes the cheap labor from North Africa. In 1947 after negociations between the French and Algerian Nationalists, Algerians received citzenship and are allowed to move freely between the two countries. Half a million settled in France by the 50s. These immigrants were housed in much worse sanitary conditions than exist today but one main principal still exists. Since the beginning, lodging of immigrants has remained OUTSIDE of the city and in very concentrated spots. The bearly livable slums near industrial centers were replaced over time by the Cités of today. Though the lodging is of a much higher standard in terms of cleanliness, running water, etc. other types of serious problems exist. As explained above, these extremely dense populated areas aggravate social ills such as unemployment, lack of recreation, decreased quality of education, degradation of public spaces, etc.